Thursday 4 September 2014

Former Scottish Secretaries say wealth and strength of Union offers best future for Scotland

Three former Scottish Secretaries of State for Scotland have come together to issue a powerful case for keeping the Union, arguing the economic and financial case against breaking up the UK is unarguable.

Lord Lang of Monkton, Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Lord Forsyth of Drumlean said in a joint statement that an independent Scotland would not enjoy the same wealth and strength the country currently enjoys as part of the United Kingdom.

They added that being part of a joint Union with England, Wales and Northern Ireland offers the strongest springboard to the wider world for young people in Scotland.

Lord Lang said: “We think it right to focus on the broad issues and the long term. The separatist campaign focuses too much on airy electioneering promises, but the Referendum is about a once-and for-all decision on the future of Scotland."

Lord Forsyth said: “At a time of great political and financial uncertainty we need the strength of a United Kingdom to protect and secure our children's future. Now is not the moment for a reckless gamble and a leap into the unknown.”

Joint statement:

 

“We, who have served in government as Secretaries of State for Scotland, believe strongly that Scotland, the land we love, should remain in the United Kingdom. We believe that the value and the emotional appeal of the present Union is far more compelling than the mirage of Independence.  The one has stood the test of three centuries.  The other is built on a myth that sees Scotland as a deprived country, exploited by an uncaring neighbour.

From our knowledge gained in government, we maintain that the economic and financial case against breaking up the United Kingdom is so clear as to be unarguable; that any hope that with Independence Scotland could achieve material or social objectives unavailable within the Union is vain; and that the chance of Scotland maintaining in isolation the wealth and strength she enjoys as part of Britain is non-existent.

We hold that the constitutional, financial and legal difficulties of unscrambling so integrated and successful a Union as ours would be as complicated, damaging and heart-rending as breaking up any marriage can be.  Divorce is always painful – the more so when the two parties must continue to live next door to one another.  We warn that separation of Scotland from England, Wales and Northern Ireland after so long together would lead to pain and blame:  that decades of aggravation would follow, to the detriment of all.

We must remind ourselves that we Scots have achieved much in the world because of Britain.  No less has Britain prospered because of Scotland.  We have helped each other to make our United Kingdom one of the richest, most successful and most influential powers on Earth.  None can doubt the Scottish contribution to this achievement, on a scale that being part of Britain opened up for us.  Far from being fettered by the Union, Scotland has been liberated by it.

Our contribution to Britain’s industry, engineering, science, medicine, philosophy, literature, the arts and sport has been incalculable.  We have run Scotland, run Britain, run the Empire and Commonwealth over the centuries.  We have fought tyranny alongside the rest of the British peoples.  Our shared commitment to freedom and the rule of law has been a beacon of light for the world.

Nor has Scotland’s own identity suffered in this partnership.  On the contrary, the Scottish character has worldwide recognition.  Whether as missionaries or merchants, explorers or administrators, we Scots have won respect and friendship wherever we have ventured.   Scottish enterprise and drive have enabled us to prosper, taking advantage of the global reach of the United Kingdom.

We contend that nationalism and patriotism are different forces.  Patriotism is positive.  It is open, forward-looking. It allows pride in Scotland and in the United Kingdom.  Nationalism is negative.  It has to be against something.  It is narrow, resentful.  While nationalism seeks to blame others for the grievances of an imagined past, patriotism seeks to share with others the challenges of a promising future.

We believe that for the young Scots of today the United Kingdom still offers, as it has always done, real opportunities that we should not reject.  England is still by far our largest market; and being part of Britain still offers a strong springboard to the wider world.  That was why, over three hundred years ago, our forebears decided to join the Union with England. 

Their decision has been triumphantly vindicated; and the same arguments hold good today.  The Union led to a marriage of nations so successful that it has shaped the modern world. It can continue to do so. Scotland has evolved within the United Kingdom.  Scots have always had our own Church, our own law, our own local government system and much of our own parliamentary legislation – first at Westminster, now in Edinburgh.  The Scottish Parliament now has more powers than the provinces of Canada or the States of Australia.   We can still have all that, as well as the comfort of a sense of family, with the added security of a home within the United Kingdom.

With the fracture of our Union, something in all of us would die. Great Britain’s history is Scotland’s history.  Without Scotland there would be no Great Britain.Why now throw all that away?  Why now put at risk our security, our prosperity, our jobs, the opportunities for our young people and the pensions of our old?  Why dismantle our great success story and embark on a sea of uncertainty?  It does not make sense.  To do so would diminish us all and bring comfort only to those who wish us ill.

We believe passionately that it need not happen and it should not happen.  We love our country, Scotland, too much to see her torn out of Britain to struggle, diminished, weakened and alone in an indifferent world.  The decision to be taken on 18th September will affect the lives of generations unborn.  

With heart and mind we urge our fellow-Scots to stand firm for the United Kingdom, whose past has been magnificent and where our future would be secure.

IAN LANG, MALCOLM RIFKIND, MICHAEL FORSYTH


MICHAEL FORSYTH was Secretary of State for Scotland from 1995 to 1997

IAN LANG was Secretary of State for Scotland from 1990 to 1995.

MALCOLM RIFKIND was Secretary of State for Scotland from 1986 to 1990.